Tuesday, December 08, 2009

Atheism, hubris and fallen angels.


According to Charles Moore in this week's Spectator, organised atheists of the Dawkinsite variety turned up mob-handed to an Intelligence Squared debate in true Trotskite style to skew the vote towards their preferred result. The debate was 'Atheism is the New Fundamentalism' with Moore and the Anglican cleric Richard Harries against Dawkins and AC Grayling. You can watch the debate HERE.

Apparently such atheists have started calling themselves 'Brights' which recalls nothing other than Lucifer huimself (he was a pretty bright chap). Indeed such is their hubris that they are obviously unaware of Bright's Disease:

The Symptoms Of Bright's Disease
The consequences are increasing weakness and frequently emaciation, en-feeblement of the mental powers owing to the presence of effete products in the blood....

Labels: ,

4 Comments:

OpenID ebomania said...

Brights Disease.

Love it.

8:51 PM  
Blogger Pablo said...

Satan is not an atheist.

If you examine the satanic societies, such as the freemasons, atheists need not apply.

Even satan finds atheists dispicable.

*

1:16 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

First of all you are NOT bright. For yes Lucifer does refer to "light" or "illumination" because in Christian mythology his character in the story called the bible, he is a reference to the star Venus. The "bright" and morning star. Because our ancestors could see it early in morning during the sun rise. So they thought it must be special. And they did put it into christian mythology

Also atheism is the NON BELIEF in any and all gods or other mythological characters.
You trying to connect Richard Dawkins to Satan is just ridiculous.

10:09 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

also Venus is a planet not a star that was a typo. sorry

10:11 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home